Lindsay Clancy's Defense Rests at Trial Over Postpartum Psychosis in Killing of Children
-
Lindsay Clancy's defense rests at trial over whether postpartum psychosis drove her to killings Clancy's lawyer, Kevin Reddington, hasn't disputed that she killed the children but says she should not be held criminally responsible because she had postpartum psychosis, a rare mental illness linked to the stress, sleep deprivation and hormonal changes that follow childbirth.
Compare 4 other versions
The Guardian USThe trial of Lindsay Clancy, a former nurse accused of murdering her three children, is wrapping up its fifth week. On Friday morning, the defense rested, and the public attention to the case is at a fever-pitch — especially on social media. Clancy, 36, does not deny that she strangled her children, but has pleaded not guilty due to lack of criminal responsibility, also known as an insanity defense. She argues that she was in the throes of postpartum psychosis, a rare and devastating condition that can go unrecognized and untreated.
The Daily WireThe case has become a lightning rod with the public, largely because Clancy’s defense argues that she had postpartum psychosis at the time of the killings. Clancy’s defense team is relying on what’s commonly referred to as the insanity defense to argue that she was not criminally responsible because of her mental state. The state says Clancy was aware of what she was doing when she killed her children.
BBC NewsThe defence, which rested its case on Friday, does not dispute that Clancy carried out the killings but say she has pleaded not guilty to murder charges because she was experiencing postpartum psychosis.
Associated PressThe family eventually learned that Chesterton had postpartum psychosis, a severe mental health disorder thrust into the spotlight by the case of Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts woman on trial for strangling her three children. A key question is whether postpartum psychosis drove Clancy to do it.
-
Stars and Stripes editor, reporter fired for insubordination after doing CBS interview The Pentagon on Friday fired the editor-in-chief of Stars and Stripes and a top reporter for insubordination after they spoke publicly against any interference by the Defense Department in the military news outlet that has a long history of editorial independence.
Compare 2 other versions
Washington TimesThe Pentagon fired the editor-in-chief of Stars and Stripes, a top reporter and its retiring publisher, two of whom were dismissed for “insubordination,” the newspaper reported Friday.
BBC NewsPublished The editor-in-chief of US military newspaper Stars and Stripes has told the BBC of his concern over censorship a day after being dismissed by the US Department of Defense (DoD) for "insubordination".
-
He said in a statement, “I stand by the principle that Stars and Stripes must remain editorially independent, as required by law and by the department’s own policies.”
Compare 1 other version
BBC NewsEven though partially funded by the Pentagon, Stars and Stripes has been editorially independent - through a congressional mandate and DoD rules.
-
Ms. Korte said her firing came after she told a CBS reporter, “I work for Stars and Stripes — not the Pentagon, not any administration and not any policymaker.”
Compare 1 other version
BBC NewsThe newspaper's Middle East reporter Lara Korte said she had also been told she was fired.
-
Publisher Max Lederer Jr. was fired after announcing his retirement on Tuesday, telling staff that his understanding of the value and mission of Stars and Stripes differed in “fundamental ways” from the Pentagon.
Compare 1 other version
BBC NewsStars and Stripes reported that publisher Max Lederer was also fired. He had announced his retirement on Tuesday, saying his understanding of the paper's value and mission differed in "fundamental ways" from the Pentagon's plans for the publication.
-
Resnick evaluated Clancy after the killings and reviewed her medical records. Clancy lacked control and was likely unable to tell the difference between right and wrong on that January 2023 day, he told the jury on Friday.
Compare 1 other version
The Daily WireThe data offers a glimpse into Clancy’s physiological state around the time of the killings and prompted intense reaction online. Some suggested it showed Clancy’s methodical and planned approach, while others viewed it as evidence that could bolster the defense’s case that Clancy was experiencing psychosis rather than acting in a fit of rage.
8 details only one outlet reported
Independent claims that didn't surface elsewhere in our corpus. Treat as supplementary — not corroborated across outlets.
-
01 RealClearPolitics Justice for Lindsay Clancy?
-
02 The Guardian US Host Carter Sherman speaks with Jenna Amatulli, deputy head of news for Guardian US, about how the case has renewed attention on the fundamental shortcomings in the US's maternal healthcare system, and about why Clancy's story has captivated – and polarized – so many people
-
03 BBC News Slavin says he believes he was fired for having stated in an interview that "in a hypothetical situation, censorship would be a red line". A reporter and the paper's publisher were also sacked.
-
04 New York Times A Murder Trial in Massachusetts How the trial of Lindsay Clancy has become a proxy for how people view society’s ills.
-
05 Associated Press EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.
-
06 Washington Times This comes after Erik Slavin, the editor-in-chief, and Middle East reporter Lara Korte defended the quasi-independent military newspaper’s editorial freedom against perceived Defense Department interference in a reportedly unauthorized interview with CBS News.
-
07 The Daily Wire Here are the most shocking moments from the trial so far: The 911 call One of the most emotional moments of the trial came when jurors heard Patrick Clancy’s frantic 911 call after he returned home and discovered his three children had been strangled.
-
08 National Review No, All Women Do Not Identify with Lindsay Clancy The trial is Luigi Mangione madness all over again.
Fact Corroboration
Which sources independently confirm the same facts. Hover a claim to see its sources, or a source to see what it corroborates.
Coverage by Perspective
Source Similarity
Connections show how similarly each outlet covered this story. Thicker lines = more similar framing.
Sources (9)
- pbs
- nyt
- ap
- dailywire
- nationalreview
- guardian
- rcp
- bbc
- washtimes