Trump Seeks Judge to Block BBC's Subpoena in Family Defamation Lawsuit

Broke: Updated:
The story so far — full thread
Trump Seeks Judge to Block BBC's Subpoena in Family Defamation Lawsuit
Photo: Fortune
money· A press review of 3 outlets
  1. President Donald Trump is asking a federal judge to reject the BBC's attempt to subpoena three members of his family as part of discovery in his defamation lawsuit against the British broadcaster.

    Compare 1 other version
    Fortune

    President Donald Trump has urged a federal judge to reject the BBC’s request for the court’s help in securing testimony and documents from three family members in response to his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the British broadcaster.

  2. The BBC is trying to gain “politically-driven leverage” over Trump by serving subpoenas on daughter Ivanka Trump, son-in-law Jared Kushner and son Donald Trump Jr., personal lawyers for the Republican president argued in a court filing Friday.

    Compare 1 other version
    ZeroHedge

    Trump's attorneys filed a memorandum Aug. 21 opposing the BBC's request for permission to use alternative methods to serve subpoenas on Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Jared Kushner.

  3. Trump’s lawsuit, filed in December, accuses the BBC of deceptively editing portions of the speech that he delivered near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory over Trump. The suit claims the BBC spliced together separate parts of Trump’s speech to intentionally misrepresent what he said.

    Compare 1 other version
    ZeroHedge

    The lawsuit concerns a BBC documentary in which the BBC spliced together portions of the president's Jan. 6 speech, delivered nearly 55 minutes apart, while omitting his statement that supporters should march "peacefully and patriotically" to the U.S. Capitol.

  4. The BBC has apologized to Trump for the misleading edit, but it denies defaming him.

    Compare 1 other version
    ZeroHedge

    The BBC apologized for the editing but said it was an unintentional error and does not meet the legal threshold for defamation.

From the margins

2 details only one outlet reported

Independent claims that didn't surface elsewhere in our corpus. Treat as supplementary — not corroborated across outlets.

  1. 01 ZeroHedge

    The court ruled Aug. 6 that the lawsuit did not permit the BBC to "relitigate and discover every aspect" of Jan. 6 or seek discovery from "any and all individuals" with knowledge of the events. The judge directed the parties to conduct a meaningful conference to resolve remaining discovery disputes.

  2. 02 Fortune

    Kuntz, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, inherited the president’s lawsuit from another judge less than a week ago. Court filings did not immediately specify a reason for the case’s reassignment. The previous judge has set a February trial date.

Assembled from 4 corroborated claims drawn from 3 independent outlets. Every passage above is taken verbatim — Dorothy doesn't paraphrase or summarize.

Fact Corroboration

Which sources independently confirm the same facts. Hover a claim to see its sources, or a source to see what it corroborates.

Coverage by Perspective

Left
1
Lean-Left
1
Lean-Right
2

Source Similarity

Connections show how similarly each outlet covered this story. Thicker lines = more similar framing.

Sources (3)

  • commondreams
  • fortune
  • zerohedge

Original Articles (4)