Boston District Judge Blocks Postal Service's New Mail Voting Rules, Legal Battle Continuo
-
Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, blocked the Postal Service’s fresh rules just days after they were announced, issuing a 14-day temporary restraining order that halts mandatory compliance for the upcoming November 3 elections. Days before Talwani’s ruling, the Supreme Court had handed the Trump administration a major procedural victory, lifting a previous injunction against the president’s executive order because the states had sued before final rules were issued.
Compare 8 other versions
ABC NewsU.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani issued a temporary order preventing the United States Postal Service from increasing its oversight of mail-in voting, following an executive order from President Donald Trump that would effectively employ the Postal Service as the primary enforcer of mail-voter eligibility.
Washington ExaminerObama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued the order blocking parts of the U.S. Postal Service’s newly implemented rule to enact new measures on mail-in voting that Democratic plaintiffs say exceed executive authority while restricting mail-in voting. Talwani wrote that the temporary restraining order will be in place for 14 days, temporarily preventing the rules from going into effect for two weeks for all Nov. 3, 2026, elections just ahead of the general midterm election season.
The Guardian USThe president’s directive stalled for a second time about a week before the first mail ballots are due to be sent out for the rapidly approaching midterm elections. In the US district court, Judge Indira Talwani placed a 14-day hold on the government implementing the order in a case that could be headed back to the supreme court, which on Monday overturned an earlier ruling of hers that had blocked Trump’s order from taking effect.
PBS NewsHourJudge again blocks Trump mail ballot executive order in ruling that's likely to be swiftly appealed A federal judge on Thursday halted — at least for now — attempts to implement President Donald Trump's executive order limiting mail voting.
Washington TimesA federal judge issued a restraining order Thursday night forbidding the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out President Trump’s plans to police which mailed ballots can be delivered for November’s election, saying the agency overstepped its boundaries.
Fox NewsA federal judge on Thursday again blocked President Donald Trump's executive order limiting mail-in voting, halting the directive, at least for now, for a second time with only about a week before the first mail ballots are expected to be sent out for the upcoming midterm elections.
Associated PressTrump’s executive order was challenged in court shortly after being issued in March. Talwani, nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, agreed to block it for the midterm elections. But the Supreme Court found earlier this week that she had acted too soon. The Post Office plan has since been finalized.
NBC NewsA federal judge Thursday blocked a Postal Service regulation that would exert control over mail-in ballots ahead of the midterm elections in the latest setback on the issue for President Donald Trump.
-
The ruling is likely to be quickly appealed and could soon make its way back to the Supreme Court, days after the nation's highest court handed down a procedural decision that allowed the administration to move forward.
Compare 2 other versions
Associated PressThe Supreme Court previously allowed the plan to move ahead on procedural grounds, but hasn’t decided whether it’s legal. The U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals will next consider the case, though it could soon be back before the nation’s highest court.
NBC NewsThe Trump administration could now seek to quickly overturn her decision by rushing to the Supreme Court.
-
The administration has now issued a formal rule governing how states must prepare and submit mail ballots for USPS acceptance, effectively taking the legal fight back to square one.
Compare 1 other version
The Guardian USSince then, the administration has issued a formal rule intended to govern whether the US Postal Service will deliver states’ mail ballots – effectively restarting the legal fight.
-
The whipsawing legal battle has major ramifications for the midterms. Nearly one-third of Americans vote by mail and election officials contend there is not enough time to revise their systems to comply with the new postal service directives.
Compare 2 other versions
Associated PressThe whipsawing legal battle could have major ramifications for the midterms. Nearly one-third of Americans vote by mail and election officials contend there isn’t enough time to revise their systems to comply with the new Postal Service directives.
Fox NewsThe case will have a significant impact on November's midterms, as nearly one-third of Americans vote by mail and election officials argue there is not enough time to amend their systems to comply with the new directives.
-
Talwani wrote in her ruling: Plaintiff states have neither time nor funds to design new mail ballots, seek approval of the new designs, order production of mail ballots, update their own election management systems, train election officials to use the USPS portal and upload citizen data to the portal, all before the midterms.
Compare 2 other versions
Fox News"Plaintiff states have neither time nor funds to design new mail ballots, seek approval of the new designs, order production of mail ballots, update their own election management systems, train election officials to use the USPS portal and upload citizen data to the portal, all before the midterms," Talwani wrote in Thursday's ruling.
Associated PressThe plaintiffs didn’t have immediate comment on the appeal. U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani found that states don’t have the time or money to design and produce new ballots, update their systems and train officials to upload voter data to the Postal Service in the short time before the midterm elections.
-
The president has long targeted mail voting, which he falsely blames for his 2020 election loss even though he himself uses it to cast his ballot. A report by the Brookings Institution published in 2025 found that mail voting fraud occurred in only about four cases out of every 10 million mail ballots cast.
Compare 3 other versions
The Guardian USThe president has long targeted mail voting, which he falsely blames for his 2020 election loss even though he himself uses it to cast his ballot. A report by the Brookings Institution published in 2025 found that mail voting fraud occurred in only about four cases out of every 10 million mail ballots cast.
Fox NewsAccording to a 2025 report by the Brookings Institution, mail-in voting fraud was recorded in only about four cases out of every 10 million mail ballots cast, contradicting claims by Trump and his allies that election fraud is widespread. The analysis covered general elections from 2016 through 2022 and relied in part on a database that its source says is not comprehensive.
NBC NewsTrump often criticizes mail-in ballots, claiming without evidence there is rampant fraud even though they are widely used by Republicans and Democrats all across the country.
-
“In any event, the USPS’s interest in correcting an unsubstantiated problem through likely unconstitutional means is dwarfed by the overwhelming risk of pervasive disenfranchisement of citizens who need access to mail ballots in order to vote,” she wrote.
Compare 1 other version
Washington Examiner“The USPS’s interest in correcting an unsubstantiated problem through likely unconstitutional means is dwarfed by the overwhelming risk of pervasive disenfranchisement of citizens who need access to mail ballots in order to vote. The balance of harms and public interest warrants a TRO,” Talwani wrote.
10 details only one outlet reported
Independent claims that didn't surface elsewhere in our corpus. Treat as supplementary — not corroborated across outlets.
-
01 Fox News Former White House deputy counsel Gene Hamilton said federal agencies such as the Postal Service can now move forward with parts of Trump’s election-integrity order, including new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists, as opposing states wait to see which concrete federal actions could form the basis of new lawsuits.
-
02 Washington Examiner Talwani wrote in her 11-page order that the restraint applies to the sections of the rule that mandate envelope standards for ballots, mandate state registration and voter enrollment on the USPS’s federal mail-in ballot portal, and block states from sending ballots to voters who do not comply with the new envelope or portal standards.
-
03 NBC News Talwani wrote that the regulation is likely unlawful because the president cannot insert the federal government into elections without the express authorization of Congress.
-
04 The Guardian US Anna Betts Donald Trump’s administration is facing calls to launch an investigation into allegations that Michael Boren, a senior official who oversees the US Forest Service, pressed agency staff to deploy additional resources to fight a fire burning near his Idaho ranch.
-
05 Associated Press The notice of appeal filed Friday comes after a federal judge in Boston handed down a new decision blocking implementation of an executive order from President Donald Trump for the next two weeks.
-
06 Reuters US judge won't immediately block Trump's newest order limiting birthright citizenship - Reuters US judge won't immediately block Trump's newest order limiting birthright citizenship Reuters
-
07 Washington Times She said absent the restraining order, states would have been forced to redesign their ballot mail envelopes, reorder those supplies, train election officials to comply with the new federal mandate and provide voter lists to the postal service, all before the election.
-
08 PBS NewsHour WATCH: Trump calls Supreme Court ruling on mail ballots 'great' for Republican Party PBS News White House correspondent Liz Landers asked the president about what the ruling means for states like North Carolina, where mail-in ballots are due to be sent out next week.
-
09 The Federalist A Maryland judge this week saw through the legally tortured redistricting scheme and put the kibosh on the hastily made ballot question.
-
10 The Daily Wire The Department of Justice is expected to appeal Talwani’s ruling immediately, setting up yet another potential showdown before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Fact Corroboration
Which sources independently confirm the same facts. Hover a claim to see its sources, or a source to see what it corroborates.
Coverage by Perspective
Source Similarity
Connections show how similarly each outlet covered this story. Thicker lines = more similar framing.
Sources (11)
- pbs
- abc
- dailywire
- ap
- foxnews
- federalist
- nbc
- guardian
- washexaminer
- washtimes
- reuters