Trump Vows 'Powerful Appeal' After Federal Court Rejects Hush Money Case
-
Trump vows ‘powerful appeal’ after another federal court rejects hush money case A federal court on Friday again rejected President Donald Trump’s effort to move his New York hush money conviction into federal court, dealing a setback to his attempt to press presidential immunity arguments outside the state appeals process. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that Trump’s renewed transfer bid came too late and did not […]
Compare 8 other versions
New York TimesJudge Again Denies Trump’s Request to Move Hush-Money Case to Federal Court The ruling, from Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, blocks President Trump’s quickest path to overturning his 2024 conviction for covering up hush-money payments to a porn star.
The HillTrump can’t appeal NY conviction in federal court, judge rules again A federal judge on Friday rejected President Trump’s latest bid to fight his criminal conviction outside of New York’s state courts, a strategy aimed at citing presidential immunity so Trump can toss charges that stem from a 2016 hush money payment in the trash can. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein has now denied Trump’s attempts to move to federal court three times. An…
PBS NewsHourTrump loses again in bid to erase his hush money conviction It is the third time Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has blocked Trump from having the U.S. District Court in Manhattan seize control of the case from the New York court where he was tried and convicted.
Associated PressNEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge on Friday once again spurned Donald Trump’s effort to erase his hush money conviction, rejecting the president’s bid to move the state court case to federal court and have it dismissed on presidential immunity grounds.
Washington TimesThis marks the third time Judge Hellerstein has blocked an attempt to shift and dismiss the case in federal court, and Friday’s ruling was the second time Judge Hellerstein had denied Mr. Trump’s request that his criminal case be handled in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
New York PostNEW YORK — A federal judge on Friday once again spurned Donald Trump’s effort to erase his hush money conviction, rejecting the president’s bid to move the state court case to federal court and have it dismissed on presidential immunity grounds.
ABC NewsTrump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. For a second time, a federal judge on Friday rejected President Trump’s attempt to move his criminal hush money case to federal court, where his conviction could be vacated.
ReutersTrump loses bid to move already-decided criminal hush money case to US court - Reuters Trump loses bid to move already-decided criminal hush money case to US court Reuters
-
“The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be removed to federal court, and immediately overturned and dismissed,” a statement issued on behalf of the legal team said. “President Trump will be filing a powerful appeal, and will continue defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn.”
Compare 2 other versions
New York Post“The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be removed to federal court, and immediately overturned and dismissed,” a statement issued on behalf of the legal team said. “President Trump will be filing a powerful appeal, and will continue defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn.”
Washington Times“The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be removed to federal court, and immediately overturned and dismissed,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
-
The guilty verdict, reached in May 2024 while Trump was between terms, made him the first former — and now current — U.S. president to be convicted of a crime. Trump is also challenging his conviction through the state court appellate process, which is pending.
Compare 1 other version
New York PostThe guilty verdict, reached in May 2024 while Trump was between terms, made him the first former — and now current — U.S. president to be convicted of a crime.
-
The president’s separate appeal through the state court system remains ongoing. His legal team argued that the Supreme Court’s landmark 2024 decision, which found that former presidents enjoy immunity for certain acts in their constitutional scope of office, applied to state prosecutions and invalidated testimony involving official acts from his first term.
Compare 1 other version
ABC NewsTrump has argued the Supreme Court's controversial 2024 presidential immunity decision, which established sweeping protection from prosecution for "official acts," made some of the evidence and testimony from the prosecution's case off-limits.
4 details only one outlet reported
Independent claims that didn't surface elsewhere in our corpus. Treat as supplementary — not corroborated across outlets.
-
01 New York Post Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein reiterated his earlier finding against Trump, saying that the reasons Trump cited for renewing his request were “neither new nor legally sufficient.”
-
02 Associated Press Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein reiterated his earlier finding against Trump, saying that the reasons Trump cited for renewing his request were “neither new nor legally sufficient.”
-
03 ABC News “The grounds for a second removal cited by Defendant, Donald J. Trump, are neither new nor legally sufficient. He has failed to show good cause and diligence,” Judge Alvin Hellerstein decided.
-
04 Washington Times Judge Alvin Hellerstein, a Clinton appointee, said that the president’s arguments to seek removal of the case to federal court were “neither new nor legally sufficient.”
Fact Corroboration
Which sources independently confirm the same facts. Hover a claim to see its sources, or a source to see what it corroborates.
Coverage by Perspective
Source Similarity
Connections show how similarly each outlet covered this story. Thicker lines = more similar framing.
Sources (9)
- pbs
- abc
- nypost
- nyt
- ap
- thehill
- washexaminer
- washtimes
- reuters